dc.contributor.author |
Jagger, Pamela |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Brockhaus, Maria |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Duchelle, Amy E. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Gebara, Maria Fernanda |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Lawlor, Kathleen |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sunderlin, William D. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-11-26T02:24:36Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-11-26T02:24:36Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2014-09 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Jagger, P., Brockhaus, M., Duchelle, A. E., Gebara, M. F., Lawlor, K., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., & Sunderlin, W. D. (2014). Multi-level policy dialogues, processes, and actions: challenges and opportunities for national REDD+ safeguards measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV). Forests, 5(9), 2136-2162. |
en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn |
1999-4907 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
DOI: 10.3390/f5092136 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://www.taccire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/306 |
|
dc.description |
This article is available at www.mdpi.com/journal/forests |
en_GB |
dc.description.abstract |
REDD+ social safeguards have gained increasing attention in numerous forums.
This paper reviews the evolution of multi-level policy dialogues, processes, and actions
related to REDD+ social safeguards (e.g., Cancun Safeguards 1–5) among policy makers,
civil society organizations, and within the media in Brazil, Indonesia and Tanzania, three
countries with well advanced REDD+ programs. We find that progress on core aspects of
social safeguards is uneven across the three countries. Brazil is by far the most advanced
having drafted a REDD+ social safeguards policy. Both Brazil and Indonesia have benefited
from progress made by strong sub-national entities in the operationalization of REDD+
safeguards including free prior and informed consent (FPIC), participation, and benefit
sharing. Tanzania has weakly articulated how social safeguards will be operationalized and
has a more top-down approach. We conclude that in all three countries, measuring,
reporting and verifying progress on social safeguards is likely to be a complex issue. Stakeholders with vested interests in REDD+ social safeguards operate in polycentric rather
than nested systems, suggesting that aggregation of information from local to national-scale
will be a challenge. However, polycentric systems are also likely to support more transparent
and comprehensive safeguards systems. Clear direction from the international community
and financing for REDD+ safeguard MRV is essential if REDD+ social safeguards are to
be meaningfully integrated into forest-based climate mitigation strategies. |
en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship |
Norwegian Agency for
Development Cooperation (Norad), the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the
Department for International Development (DFID) of the United Kingdom, the European Commission
(EC), the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (CRP-FTA), and funding
partners who have contributed to the CGIAR Fund. |
en_GB |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_GB |
dc.publisher |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
en_GB |
dc.subject |
Benefit sharing |
en_GB |
dc.subject |
Governance |
en_GB |
dc.subject |
REDD+ |
en_GB |
dc.subject |
Participation |
en_GB |
dc.subject |
Polycentric |
en_GB |
dc.subject |
Policy |
en_GB |
dc.title |
Multi-level policy dialogues, processes, and actions: challenges and opportunities for national REDD+ Safeguards Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) |
en_GB |
dc.type |
Article |
en_GB |